VolRC RAS scientific journal (printed edition)
28.03.202403.2024с 01.01.2024
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Life quality and human potential of territories"

Internet Practices of Citizens’ Participation in Creating Comfortable Urban Area (Case Study of the Northwestern Federal District)

Smoleva E.O.

Volume 25, Issue 2, 2021

Smoleva E.O. Internet practices of citizens’ participation in creating comfortable urban area (case study of the Northwestern federal district). Problems of Territory's Development, 2021, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 90–107. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2021.2.112.6

DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2021.2.112.6

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Uskova T.V. Territories’ sustainable development and modern management methods. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 2020, no. 2 (106), pp. 7–18. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.2.106.1 (in Russian).
  2. Nikovskaya L.I. Political institutions, processes and technologies. Sotsial'no-politicheskiye issledovaniya=Social and Political Researchers, 2020, no. 2 (7), pp. 5–19. DOI: 10.20323/2658-428X-2020-2-7-5-19 (in Russian).
  3. Insa-Ciriza R. Two ways of new towns development: A tale of two cities. In: Urban Development. Ed. by Dr. Serafeim Polyzos. InTech Publ., 2012. Р. 219–242. DOI: 10.5772/37906
  4. Gnedash A.A., Ryabchenko N.A. Constructive destructive socio-political practices in today Russia online-space: fail, case, mechanics. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye=Human. Community. Management, 2014, no. 2, pp. 40–54 (in Russian).
  5. Chugunov A.V. Interaction of government and citizens in the institutional environment of e-participation. Vlast’=Power, 2017, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 59–66 (in Russian).
  6. Guzhavina T.A. Collective actions and social capital: implication of concepts. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 191–203 (in Russian).
  7. Sadilova A.V. Russian Internet-activizm practices on the subnational level. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye=Human. Community. Management, 2015, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 49–59 (in Russian).
  8. Nikovskaya L.I., Yakimets V.N. Public policy as an indicator of interaction quality between government and society (the results of monitoring public policy in Russia’s regions). Politicheskaya ekspertiza=Political Expertise, 2012, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 126–141 (in Russian).
  9. Skalaban I.A. Public participation: theoretical and methodological problem of interpretation. Sovremennyye issledovaniya sotsial'nykh problem=Modern Studies of Social Issues, 2011, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 216–220 (in Russian).
  10. Almond G.A., Verba S. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Sage Publications, Inc., 1989. 364 p.
  11. Sungurov A.Yu. The mediator-organizations in the structure of civil society (some problems of Russia’s political modernization). Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya=Polis. Political Studies, 1999, no. 6, pp. 34–48 (in Russian).
  12. Castells M. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban Regional Process. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1989. 416 р.
  13. Benschop A. Net Activisme en Wolk Bewegingen. New York: Basic Books, 1973. 375 p.
  14. Teocharis Y. The Conceptualization of Digitality Networked Participation. Social Media Society, 2015, vol. 2, iss. 1. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305115610140
  15. Bronnikov I.A. Civil Internet activism: trends and prospects. Vestnik Povolzhskogo Instituta upravleniya=The Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, 2017, no. 17 (4), pp. 94–102 (in Russian).
  16. Morozov E. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs, 2012. 432 p.
  17. Volodenkov S.V. The development of contemporary information and communication technologies as a factor in the formation of a paradigm of a network communications society. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta=Moscow State University Vestnik, 2016, no. 2, pp. 21–34 (in Russian).
  18. Bronnikov I.A. Self-organization of citizens in the age of digital communications. Kontury global'nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo=Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2020, vol. 13, pp. 269–285 (in Russian).
  19. Norris P. Didgital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 303 p.
  20. Pyrma R.V. Concepts of civil activism in the digital space of communications. Vlast’=Power, 2020, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 74–81 (in Russian).
  21. Bennett L.W. The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2012, no. 644, pp. 20–39. DOI: 10.1177/0002716212451428
  22. Fox S. Is it time to update the definition of political participation? Parliamentary Affairs, 2014, vol. 67, iss. 2, pp. 495–505. DOI: 10.1093/pa/gss094
  23. Frolov A.A., Agurova A.A. Index Analysis of active citizenship in social networks. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya. Religiovedeniye=the Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series “Political Science and Religion Studies”, 2019, vol. 29, pp. 28–43 (in Russian).
  24. Sanoff H. Multiple views of participatory design. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2008, vol. 2 (1), рр. 57–69.
  25. Kiyanenko K.V. Henry Sanoff: to architecture, concerned with a man. About designing people, with people and for people. Arkhitekturnyy vestnik=Architectural Bulletin, 2010, no. 1, pp. 112–121 (in Russian).
  26. Il’ina I.N. Urban area quality as a factor of municipalities’ sustainable development. Imushchestvennyye otnosheniya v RF=property Relations in the Russian Federation, 2015, no. 5 (164), pp. 69–82 (in Russian).
  27. Nikovskaya L.I., Yakumits V.N. Public administration and cross-sectoral partnerships. Ed. by A.I. Solov’ev. Grazhdanskiy sektor v gosudarstvennom upravlenii=Civil Sector in Public Administartion. Moscow: Argamak-Media, 2018, pp. 207–225 (in Russian).
  28. Plyusnin Yu.M. Public activity in small towns. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues, 2012, no. 1, pp. 116–121 (in Russian).
  29. Ermolaeva P., Ermolaeva Yu., Basheva O. Digital environmental activism as a new form of environmental participation. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye=Russian Sociological Review, 2020, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 376–408 (in Russian).
  30. Oser J., Boulianne S. Reinforcement effects between digital media use and political participation: A meta-analysis of repeated-wave panel data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2020, vol. 84 (S1), pp. 355–365. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfaa017
  31. Smith B.G., Krishna A., Al-Sinan R. Beyond slacktivism: Examining the entanglement between social media engagement, empowerment, and participation in activism. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2019, vol. 13 (3), pp. 182–196. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2019.1621870
  32. Kozlov S.E. Internet activism as a form of political participation in modern Russia. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye=Public Administration, 2020, no. 79, pp. 154–169 (in Russian).

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today: