VolRC RAS scientific journal (printed edition)
04.12.202412.2024с 01.01.2024
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Innovation potential of territorial development"

The Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Resource Provision of Innovative Development of Regions and Their Economic Growth

Grachev S.A., Donichev O.A.

1 (99), 2019

Grachev S.A., Donichev O.A. The model for evaluating the efficiency of resource provision of innovative development of regions and their economic growth. Problems of Territory's Development, 2019, no.1 (99), pp. 71–86. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2019.1.99.5

DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2019.1.99.5

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Levchenko T.P., Varenikov V.A. Resursnyy podhod kak sposob ocenki innovacionnoy aktivnosti predpriyatiya // Naukovedenie. 2016. № 4. URL https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/resursnyy-podhod-kak-sposob-otsenki-innovatsionnoy-aktivnosti-predpriyatiya (data obrascheniya 18 iyulya 2018 goda).
  2. Chechina O.S. Resursnoe obespechenie innovacionnogo razvitiya otraslevoy ekonomicheskoy sistemy // Vestn. YuurGU. Ser. «Ekonomika i menedzhment». 2014. № 4. Tom 8. S. 61–66.
  3. Dmitrienko O.V., Zhalsaraeva E.A. Prirodno-resursnyy potencial kak faktor rosta ekonomiki regiona // Vestn. Vost.-Sibir. gos. un-ta tehnologiy i upravleniya. 2015. № 4. T. 55. S. 73–78.
  4. Metelev S.E. Intellektualno-resursnoe obespechenie innovacionnogo i socialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona: institucionalnyy aspekt // Uspehi sovremennoy nauki. 2016. № 4. T. 2. S. 17–23.
  5. Feshina S.S. Problemy resursnogo obespecheniya innovacionnoy modernizacii rossiyskoy ekonomiki // Nauch. zhurn. KubGAU. 2016. № 121. S. 1995–2009. DOI: 10.21515/1990-4665-121-126
  6. Shatalova T.N., Rusakova N.A. Vliyanie prirodno-resursnogo potenciala na effektivnost proizvodstva v usloviyah innovacionnogo razvitiya predpriyatiya // Naukovedenie. 2016. № 1. T. 8. URL http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/07EVN116.pdf DOI: 10.15862/07EVN116 (data obrascheniya 20.04.2018).
  7. Burkalceva D.D. Tochki ekonomicheskogo i innovacionnogo rosta: model organizacii effektivnogo funkcionirovaniya regiona // MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovacii. Razvitie). 2017. T. 8. № 1. S. 8–30. DOI: 10.18184/2079–4665.2017.8.1.8–30
  8. Shestak V.P., Tyutyunik I.G. Finansovo-pravovoe obespechenie innovacionnoy aktivnosti // Finansy: teoriya i praktika. 2017. T. 21. № 6. S. 118–127. DOI: 10/26794/2587–5671–2017–21–6-118–127
  9. Suharev O.S., Voronchihina E.N. Faktory ekonomicheskogo rosta: empiricheskiy analiz industrializacii i investiciy v tehnologicheskoe obnovlenie // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018. № 6. S. 29–47.
  10. Mezhov I.S., Kleckova E.V. Planirovanie rosta ekonomiki regiona na osnove modelirovaniya strategiy investirovaniya // Vestn. finans. un-ta. 2017. T. 21. № 3. S. 129–140.
  11. Strukturnaya politika v Rossii: novye usloviya i vozmozhnaya povestka (doklad NII VShE) // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018. № 6. S. 5–28.
  12. Kapranova L.D. Osnovnye napravleniya finansovoy podderzhki investicionnoy aktivnosti i ekonomicheskogo rosta v regionah Rossii // Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2018. T. 16. Vyp. 5. S. 792–804.
  13. Suharev O.S. Nekotorye problemy teorii ekonomicheskogo rosta // Vestn. finans. un-ta. 2017. T. 21. № 3. S. 61–74.
  14. Bakulina A.A., Rasteryaev K.O. Sozdanie usloviy dlya ustoychivogo ekonomicheskogo rosta v Rossii // Vestn. finans. un-ta. 2017. T. 3. S. 57–60.
  15. Kazakova S.M., Mihaylova A.A. Dotacionnost kak faktor ustoychivosti regionalnyh ekonomicheskih sistem // Ross. ekon. zhurn. 2018. № 2. S. 29–37.
  16. Belousov D.R., Penuhina E.A. O postroenii kachestvennoy ekosistemy ITK // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2018. № 3. S. 94–101.
  17. Douglas P.H. Comments on the Cobb-Douglas Production Function. NBER. Available at: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1474
  18. Reilly W.J. The law of retail gravitation. New York: Knickerbocker Press New York, 1931. 75 p.
  19. Converse P.D. New Laws of Retail Gravitation. Journal of Marketing, 1949, vol. 3, pp. 379–384.
  20. Haynes K.E., Fotheringham K.E. Gravity and spatial-interaction model. Scientific geography Series 2, 1984, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 9–13.
  21. Fotheringham A.S. A new set of spacial-interaction models: the theory of competing destinations. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/113417/1/ERSA1998_081.pdf
  22. Fotheringham A.S. Modelling hierarchical destination choice. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1986, vol. 18, pp. 401–418.