VolRC RAS scientific journal (printed edition)
RuEn

Journal section "Sustainable development of territories, branches, and production complexes"

Institutional Paradigm of Audit: Multidisciplinary Discourse

Chekavinskaya G.A.

3 (107), 2020

Chekavinskaya G.A. Institutional Paradigm of Audit: Multidisciplinary Discourse. Problems of Territory's Development, 2020, no. 3 (107), pp. 72–89. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.3.107.5

DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2020.3.107.5

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revolyuciy. M.: Progress, 1977. 300 s.
  2. Nort D. Instituty, institucionalnye izmeneniya i funkcionirovanie ekonomiki. M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi «Nachala», 1997. 180 s.
  3. Efimov V.M. Ekonomicheskaya nauka i filosofiya: pragmaticheskiy podhod. URL: http://inecon.org/docs/Efimov_abstract_20160414.pdf (data obrascheniya 10.01.2020).
  4. Ekonomicheskie subekty postsovetskoy Rossii (institucionalnyy analiz) / pod red. R.M. Nureeva. M.: Mosk. obsch. nauchn. fond, 2001. 804 s.
  5. Suharev O.S. Institucionalnyy analiz v issledovanii ekonomicheskih izmeneniy: principy, dopuscheniya, ogranicheniya // Ekon. analiz. 2016. № 33 (336). S. 2–13.
  6. Petrenko T.V. Evolyuciya paradigmy ekonomicheskoy nauki v kontekste formirovaniya sistemnoy paradigmy // Vestn. Taganrog. in-ta upravleniya i ekonomiki. 2012. № 1. S. 22–27.
  7. Bragina Z.V., Sokolova Yu.V., Kerpeleva A.V. Metodologiya nauchnyh issledovaniy. Yaroslavl: MUBiNT, 2016. 160 s.
  8. Alekseeva I.V. Issledovanie suschnosti i ekonomicheskoy prirody strategicheskogo audita i ego obektov // Audit i finansovyy analiz. 2010. № 6. S. 172–182.
  9. Chekavinskaya G.A. Institutional Status of Audit in the Russian Federation: Research Problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2013, vol. 27, no. 13A, pp. 53–57. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.27.elelc.12
  10. Chekavinskaya G.A. Formirovanie integrirovannoy sistemy socialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya auditorskoy deyatelnosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii: institucionalnyy podhod. Vologda: VoGTU, 2012. 99 c.
  11. Chekavinskaya G.A. Audit as form of administrative and economic impact on basic elements of the production system of the territory. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research, 2013. no. 2. Available at: http://www.science-sd.com/pdf/2013/2/24353.pdf (accessed 20.12.2019).
  12. Bell William H. Auditing. Prentice Hall, 1928. 507 p.
  13. Johnson James T., Brasseeaux J. Herman. Readings in Auditing. Sous-Western Publishing Company, 1960. 665 p.
  14. Mautz R., Sharaf H. The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association, 1961. 248 p.
  15. Wallace W.A. The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets. New York, University of Rochester, 1980. 50 p.
  16. Antle R. The auditor as an economic agent. Journal of accounting research, 1982, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 503–527.
  17. Watts R., Zimmerman J. Agency problems, auditing and the theory of the firm, some evidence. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, vol. 26, iss. 3, pp. 613–633.
  18. Fogarty T., Helan J.B., Knutson D.L. The rationality of doing «nothing»: Auditors responses to legal liability in an institutionalized environment. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 1991, no. 2 (3), pp. 201–226.
  19. Audit Quality: Agency Theory and the Role of Audit. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan, 2006. 14 p.
  20. Hayes R., Dassen R., Schilder A., Wallage Ph. Principles of auditing: an Introduction to International Standards on Auditing. Prentice Hall (Financial times), 2005. 692 p.
  21. Endaya Kh. A., Hanefah M.M. Internal Audit Effectiveness: An Approach Proposition to Develop the Theoretical Framework. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2013, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 92–102.
  22. Pilcher R., Gilchrist D., Singh I. The Relationship between Internal and External Audit in the Public Sector – A Case Study. Paper submitted to the AFAANZ Conference, 2011, July.
  23. Mihret D.G., James K., Mula J.M. Antecedents and Organisational Performance Implications of Internal Audit Effectiveness: Some Propositions and Research Agenda. Pacific Accounting Review, 2010, no. 22 (3), pp. 224– 252.
  24. Bake Ch., Bédard J., Hauret Ch. The regulation of statutory auditing: An institutional theory approach. Managerial Auditing Journal Emerald Group, 2014, vol. 29, iss. 5, pp. 371–394.
  25. Scott Richard W. Lord of the Dance: Proffessionals as Institutional Agents. Organization Studies, 2008, no. 29 (2), pp. 219–238.
  26. Elbardan H., Alic M., Ghoneim A. Resource Planning Systems Introduction and Internal Auditing Legitimacy: An Institutional Analysis. Information systems management, 2016, vol. 33, iss. 3, pp. 231–247.
  27. Lohlein L. Guarding the guardians essays on audit regulation. Dessertation, University of Luxembourg, 2016. 227 r.
  28. Boolaky P., Soobaroyen T. Adoption of International Standards on Auditing (ISA): Do Institutional Factors Matter? International Journal of Auditing, 2017, no. 21, pp. 59–81.
  29. Petrik E.A. Formirovanie i razvitie sovremennogo audita v Ukraine: institucionalnyy podhod // Mezhdunar. buhg. uchet. 2013. № 9. S. 45–52.
  30. Shastitko A.E. O metodologii institucionalnyh issledovaniy (k 80-letiyu stati Ronalda Kouza «Priroda firmy») // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2016. № 8. S. 96–119.
  31. Nureev R.M. Na puti k sozdaniyu novoy makroekonomiki: vklad institucionalizma // Zhurn. instituc. issl. 2013. T. 5. № 1. S. 6–20.
  32. Itygilova E.Yu. Institucionalnoe i metodologicheskoe obosnovanie kachestva buhgalterskogo ucheta i audita. SPb.: SPbGEU, 2015. 444 s.
  33. Kondrashova N.G. Institucionalnaya koncepciya audita // Audit i finansovyy analiz. 2012. № 4. S. 206–210.
  34. Baranov P.P. Hroniki auditorov Britanskoy korony: neizvestnye stranicy istorii audita // Auditor. vedomosti. 2016. № 4. S. 43–64.
  35. Goreglyad V.P. Sovremennyy audit: problemy i perspektivy // Dengi i kredit. 2017. № 2. S. 6–13.
  36. Gutcayt E.M. O statistike rynka auditorskih uslug: god 2015 // Auditor. vedomosti. 2016. № 6. S. 9–25.
  37. Chaya V.T. Ishodnaya paradigma razvitiya auditorskoy deyatelnosti: problemy i resheniya // Auditor. vedomosti. 2013. № 11. S. 13–20.
  38. Bulyga R.P., Melnik M.V. Audit biznesa. Praktika i problemy razvitiya. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2015. 264 s.
  39. Arabyan K.K. Teoriya audita i organizaciya auditorskoy proverki. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2016. 336 s.
  40. Pankov V.V., Chaykovskaya L.A., Kozhuhov V.L. Institucionalnye podhody k vnedreniyu praktik vnutrennego kontrolya // Audit i finansovyy analiz. 2015. № 6. S. 133–138.
  41. Lyapkina A.V. Institucionalnye aspekty audita buhgalterskoy finansovoy otchetnosti // Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya nauki i tehnologiy: mat-ly XVI mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Belgorod: APNI, 2016, № 7–8. S. 66–70.
  42. Azarskaya M.A. Institucionalnaya model rossiyskogo audita // Ekonomicheskie nauki. 2015. № 6. S. 130–133.
  43. Stepashin S.V. Gosudarstvennyy finansovyy kontrol v protivodeystvii korrupcii // Zhurn. ros. prava. 2012. № 7. S. 15–17.
  44. Chaya V.T., Assanaev N.Sh. Metodologiya primeneniya institucionalnyh podhodov v upravlencheskom uchete stroitelnoy kompanii // Audit i finansovyy analiz. 2015. № 6. S. 60–62.
  45. Zhuk V.N. Osnovy institucionalnoy teorii buhgalterskogo ucheta. SPb.: ANO «IPEV», 2013. 416 s.
  46. Kamordzhanova N.A., Selezneva A.V., Smolnikova Yu.Yu. Razlichnye sistemy finansovogo ucheta: adaptaciya k MSFO. SPb.: SPbGEU, 2016. 83 s.
  47. Komyagin D.L. Kazna i byudzhet. M.: Nauka, 2014. 498 s.
  48. Konoplyannik T.M. Sovremennyy format teorii prav sobstvennosti korporativnyh struktur v nalogovom uchete // Buhgalterskiy uchet, analiz i audit: istoriya, sovremennost i perspektivy razvitiya: mat-ly XII mezhdunar. nauch. konf. studentov, aspirantov, prepodavateley. SPb.: SPbGEU, 2017. S. 85–90.
  49. Malevski G. Litovskoe obschestvo kriminalistov: vektor dvizheniya – evropeyskaya integraciya // Ekspert-kriminalist. 2012. № 4. S. 15–19.
  50. Chekavinskaya G.A. Nauchno-metodologicheskiy podhod k auditu v institucionalnoy proekcii. SPb.: NIU ITMO, 2016. S. 282–285. URL: http://openbooks.ifmo.ru/ru/file/4274/4274.pdf (data obrascheniya 10.04.2020).
  51. Golovko M.V. Metodologicheskie osobennosti institucionalnogo podhoda k issledovaniyu tenevyh otnosheniy: preimuschestva mezhdisciplinarnosti // Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki. 2011. № 2. S. 63–67.
  52. Efimov V.M., Avtomonov V.S. Pragmatizm, dva kanona ekonomicheskoy nauki i dva liberalizma. URL: http://inecon.org/docs/Efimov_Avtonomov_paper.pdf (data obrascheniya 15.11.2019).
  53. Suharev O. Evolyucionnaya ekonomika, «neoklassika» i innovacii: Y. Shumpeter, Ya. Kornai i «effekt mody» v nauke // Investicii v Rossii. 2012. № 7. S. 34–40.
  54. Inshakov O.V., Frolov D.P. Evolyuciya institucionalizma v rossiyskoy ekonomicheskoy mysli (IX–XXI vv.). T. 1. M.: Ekonomist, 2007. 511 s.
  55. Auzan A.A. Institucionalnaya ekonomika: Novaya institucionalnaya ekonomicheskaya teoriya. M.: INFRA-M, 2011. 447 s.
  56. Erznkyan B.A. K izmereniyu i ischisleniyu institutov. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_BdkUQW0di4aVg0NU01c3BVM2M/view (data obrascheniya 10.10.2019).
  57. Evolyucionnaya i institucionalnaya ekonomicheskaya teoriya: diskussii, metody i prilozheniya: monografiya / red. A.Yu. Arhipov, S.G. Kirdina, E.M. Martishin. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2012. 368 s.
  58. Kleyner G.B. Sistemnaya ekonomika – novoe napravlenie v ekonomicheskoy nauke. URL: http://900igr.net/prezentacija/ekonomika/sistemnaja-ekonomika-novoe-napravlenie-v-ekonomicheskoj-teorii-g.b.-klejner-zam-167225/sistemnaja-kharakteristika-osnovnykh-paradigm-ekonomicheskoj-nauki-21.html (data obrascheniya 25.12.2017).
  59. Kleyner G.B. Ustoychivost rossiyskoy ekonomiki v zerkale sistemnoy ekonomicheskoy teorii. Ch. 2 // Voprosy ekonomiki. № 1. S. 117–138.

-->