VolRC RAS scientific journal (printed edition)
27.04.202404.2024с 01.01.2024
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Territorial organization and management"

Settlement System as a Result of Population’s Adaptation to the Socio-Economic Conditions of Regional Development

Makarova M.N.

Volume 27, Issue 2, 2023

Makarova M.N. (2023). Settlement system as a result of population’s adaptation to the socioeconomic conditions of regional development. Problems of Territory's Development, 27(2), 40–52. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.2.124.4

DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.2.124.4

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Andreev V.V., Lukiyanova V.Yu., Kadyshev E.N. (2017). Analysis of people territorial distribution in regions of the Volga Federal district on the base of Zipf and Gibrat laws. Prikladnye issledovaniya=Journal of Applied Research, 48, 97–121 (in Russian).
  2. Anselin L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. Baburin V.L. (2014). Interrelation between population settlement and spatial distribution of production. Regional’nye issledovaniya, 4(46), 5–16 (in Russian).
  4. Baburin V.L., Sinitsyn N.A. (2016). Modeling the spatial distribution of population and production. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 2, 7–17 (in Russian).
  5. Barro R., Sala-i-Martin X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223–251.
  6. Benguigui L., Blumenfeld-Lieberthal E. (2007). A dynamic model for city size distribution beyond Zipfs law. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 384(2), 613–627. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.05.059
  7. Gorin N., Neshchadin A. (2010). Current tendencies of transformation of the Russian system for city settlement. Obshchestvo i ekonomika=Society and Economy, 12, 140–149 (in Russian).
  8. Kozlova O.A., Makarova M.N. (2018). Inter-municipal cooperation as an institution of strategic development of territories. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 11(3), 132–144. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.3.57.9 (in Russian).
  9. Lanzieri G. (2010). Is fertility converging across the member states of the European Union? In: Work Session on Demographic Projections. Lisbon, 28–30 April 2010. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union.
  10. Leksin V.N. (2012). The Crisis of the settlement system in the context of the cardinal transformation of the territorial organization of Russian society. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal=Russian Economic Journal, 1, 3–44 (in Russian).
  11. Mazaev A.G. (2008). The national territorial settlement system as a factor of control: a geopolitical approach. Akademicheskij vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN, 1, 32–37 (in Russian).
  12. Mazaev A.G. (2017). Domestic experience of optimization of the national system of settlement. Akademicheskij vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN, 3, 20–25 (in Russian).
  13. Meerovich M. (2015). Uniqueness of urbanization in the USSR: Artificial formation of the settlement system. Proekt Baikal=Project Baikal, 45, 160–163. DOI: 10.7480/projectbaikal.45.905 (in Russian).
  14. Mishchenko V.V., Purichi V.V. (2015). Spatial approaches in economics and regional research of resettlement. Izvestiya AltGU=Izvestiya of Altai State University, 2(86), 123–127 (in Russian).
  15. Moura N.J., Ribeiro M.B. (2006). Zipf law for Brazilian cities. Physica A, 367, 441–448.
  16. Pavlov Yu.V. (2020). Regional settlement system balance: Assessment under Zipf’s law and impact on the regional development. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya=Territorial Development Issues, 8(2), 1–14. DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2020.2.52.1 (in Russian).
  17. Pavlov Yu.V., Koroleva E.N. (2014). Spatial interaction: Evaluation with the help of global and local Moran’s index. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika=Spatial Economics, 3, 95–110. DOI: 10.14530/se.2014.3.95-110 (in Russian).
  18. Rastvortseva S.N., Manaeva I.V. (2020). Zipf’s law for Russian cities: Analysis of new indicators. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 16(3), 935–947. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-20 (in Russian).
  19. Roberts B. (2014). The systems of secondary cities – the neglected drivers of urbanising economies. CIVIS. Sharing Knowledge and Learning from Cities, 7, 1–11.
  20. Sivokhip Zh.T. (2016). Geodemographic analysis of territorial settlement systems in the Ural River basin in the context of hydroecological safety. Byulleten’ Orenburgskogo nauchnogo tsentra UrO RAN, 4. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/geodemograficheskiy-analiz-territorialnyh-sistem-rasseleniya-v-basseyne-reki-ural-v-kontekste-gidroekologicheskoy-bezopasnosti (accessed: May 17, 2022; in Russian).
  21. Vazhenin A.A. (2006). The impact of changing patterns of settlement processes on the characteristics of settlement systems. Regional’nye issledovaniya, 3(9), 43–65 (in Russian).
  22. Verhovih E.Yu. (2018). Polarization policy as a means of characteristics and forecast of development of the Russian national system of settlement. Akademicheskij vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN, 1, 20–24 (in Russian).
  23. Wu Y. et al. (2020). Does China’s urban development satisfy Zipf’s law? A multiscale perspective from the NPP-VIIRS nighttime light data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 1460. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041460
  24. Zipf G.K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley Press.

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today: