VolRC RAS scientific journal (printed edition)
14.05.202405.2024с 01.01.2024
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Life quality and human potential of territories"

Precarization Signs of General Education Teaching Staff: Regional Cross-Section

Leonidova G.V.

Volume 27, Issue 6, 2023

Leonidova G.V. (2023). Precarization signs of general education teaching staff: Regional crosssection. Problems of Territory's Development, 27 (6), 157–177. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.6.128.10

DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.6.128.10

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Abankina I.V., Belova Yu.Yu., Zinkovsky K.V., Latypova E.V., Milovanov A.E. (2022). Do educators have an alternative to tutoring to increase their income? Voprosy obrazovaniya=Educational Studies Moscow, 4, 8–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-8-32 (in Russian).
  2. Abankina I.V., Vavilova A.A. Derkachev P.V. et al. (2021). Oplata truda pedagogov: kak izmenit’ situatsiyu k luchshemu? [Remuneration of Teachers: How to Change the Situation for the Better?]. Moscow: NIU VShE.
  3. Aleksandrova O.A. (2023). Problems of higher school: Inside and outside the education system. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standard of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 19(2), 157–168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_1_157_168 (in Russian)
  4. Aleksandrova O.A., Faiman N.S. (2023). Criteria for precariousness of employment of academic staff. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii=Living Standard of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 19(1), 70–85. DOI: 10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_6_70_85 (in Russian).
  5. Alves P.C., Oliveira A.F., Paro H.B.M. de S. (2019). Quality of life and burnout among faculty members: How much does the field of knowledge matter? PLoS One, 14(3), e0214217. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214217
  6. Bagnetova E.A. (2017). Factors of professional stress of educators in general education schools. Vestnik Surgutskogo gos. ped. un-ta, 3(48), 84–88 (in Russian).
  7. Bergis T.A., Krivulya Yu.S. (2020). The problem of professional stress of teachers in the modern educational system. Karel’skii nauchnyi zhurnal=Karelian Scientific Journal, 9, 1(30), 47–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26140/knz4-2020-0901-0013 (in Russian).
  8. Bobkov V.N., Gulyugina A.A., Odintsova E.V. (2022). Social consequences of thirty years of capitalist reforms in Russia. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal=Russian Economic Journal, 1, 78–107. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33983/0130-9757-2022-1-78-107 (in Russian).
  9. Chernykh N.V. (2021). Elements of precarious employment in the work of scientific and pedagogical workers. Lex russica, 74(10), 36–46. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2021.179.10.036-046 (in Russian).
  10. Crisci A., Sepe E., Malafronte P. (2019). What influences teachers’ job satisfaction and how to improve, develop and reorganize the school activities associated with them. Quality & Quantity, 53, 2403–2419. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0749-y
  11. Dolzhenko R.A., Lobova S.V. (2018). Interrelation between the employment precarization and labour mobility of scientific and pedagogical workers of regional high schools: Problem statement. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz=University Management: Practice and Analysis, 22(2), 83–96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.02.019 (in Russian).
  12. Druzhilov S.A. (2020). Issues of non-standard employment: Social and hygienic aspects. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya=Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology, 60(6), 392–398. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-6-392-398 (in Russian).
  13. Faiman N.S. (2019). Instability of terms of employment of scientific and pedagogical personnel as a factor of formation of the academic precariat. Narodonaselenie=Population, 22(4), 103–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/1561-7785-2019-00042 (in Russian).
  14. Ferrer J. (2017). Caught in a debt trap? An analysis of the financial well-being of teachers in the Philippines. The Normal Lights Journal on Teacher Education, 11, 297–324. DOI: 10.56278/tnl.v11i2.538
  15. Golovchin M.A. (2021). Implementation of the principle of decent wages in Russian Federation: Economic and statistical study. Voprosy statistiki, 28(3), 15–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-3-15-30 (in Russian).
  16. Golovchin M.A. (2022). Opportunities for the hew preemptive formation of decent labor remuneration for researchers in the Russian regions. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 3, 465–482. DOI: 10.21202/2782-2923.2022.3.465-482 (in Russian).
  17. Klimenko L.V., Posukhova O.Yu. (2017). The professional identity of urban teachers in the context of educational modernization. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii=Journal of Institutional Studies, 9(2), 137–153 (in Russian).
  18. Kolosova E.A. (2020). Precarian in general and preschool education: To statement the question. In: Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: traditsii i innovatsii v sotsial’nom razvitii regionov: sb. dokladov VI Vseros. sotsiol. kongressa (g. Tyumen’, 14–16 oktyabrya 2020 g.) [Sociology and Society: Traditions and Innovations in the Social Development of Regions: Collection of Papers of the 6th All-Russian Sociological Congress (Tyumen, October 14–16, 2020)]. Moscow: ROS; FNISTs RAN.
  19. Konstantinovskii D.L., Pinskaya M.A., Zvyagintsev R.S. (2019). Teachers’ professional well-being: From enthusiasm to burnout. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 5, 14–25. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004949-6 (in Russian).
  20. Lapina T.A. (2020). Non-standard employment of scientific and pedagogical workers of Russian universities. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Ser.: Ekonomika=Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”, 18(4), 75–81. DOI: 10.24147/1812-3988.2020.18(4).75-81 (in Russian).
  21. Layard R., Richter A. (1995). Labour market adjustment – the Russian way. In: Aslund A. (Ed.). Russian Economic Reform at Risk. London, Pinter Publishers.
  22. Leonidova G.V. (2017). Professional self-identification and well-being of teachers in the context of the ongoing educational reforms. Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 6(92), 7–26 (in Russian).
  23. Leonidova G.V., Belekhova G.V. (2021). Quality of working life of a general education teacher. In: Global’nye vyzovy i regional’noe izmerenie v zerkale sotsiologicheskikh izmerenii: mat-ly VI mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Vologda, 29 marta – 2 aprelya 2021 g.) [Global Challenges and Regional Dimension in the Mirror of Sociological Dimensions: Proceedings of the 6th International Researchand Practical Conference (Vologda, March 29 – April 2, 2021)]. Vologda: VolRC RAS (in Russian).
  24. Leonidova G.V., Golovchin M.A., Solov’eva T.S. (2018). Uchitel’ i obrazovatel’naya reforma: vzglyad iz regiona [Teachers and Educational Reform: Regional Perspective]. Vologda: VolRC RAS.
  25. Leonidova G.V., Valiakhmetov R.M., Baimurzina G.R., Babich L.V. (2020). Problems and prospects of distance learning in the estimates provided by teachers and schoolchildren’s parents. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(4), 202–219. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.4.70.12 (in Russian).
  26. Makeev P.A. (2019). Private tutoring in Russia: Description of the phenomenon based on online platforms. Journal of Institutional Studies, 11(4), 106-120. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.4.106-120 (in Russian).
  27. Maslinsky K.A., Ivaniushina V.A. (2016). To remain a teacher? Factors influencing attitudes to leaving the teaching profession. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 4, 8–30 (in Russian).
  28. Mouza A.M., Souchamval D. (2016). Effect of Greece’s new reforms and unplanned organizational changes on the stress levels of primary school teachers. Social Indicators Research, 128, 981–994.
  29. Pembroke S. (2018). Precarious Work Precarious Lives: How Policy Can Create More Security. Dublin: TASC.
  30. Popov A.V., Solov’eva T.S. (2019). From precarization to precarious work: Theoretical understanding of paradigmatic concepts. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskie nauki=St. Petersburg Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 12(5), 90–101. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12507 (in Russian).
  31. Popov D.S., Strel’nikova A.V., Grigor’eva E.A. (2023). Teachers in the “digitalization crisis”: On the threshold of a “new Luddism”? Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal=Sociological Journal, 29(1), 55–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.1.3 (in Russian).
  32. Raikhel’gauz L.B. (2019). Tutoring as a social and pedagogical phenomenon. Sotsial’no-politicheskie issledovaniya=Social and Political Research, 3(4), 106–114. DOI: 10.24411/2658-428Х-2019-10515 (in Russian).
  33. Rzhanitsyna L. (2000). Working women in Russia at the end of the 1990s. Problems of Economic Transition, 43(7), 56–67.
  34. Sheregi F.E. (2016). Teachers of the general education institutions: Labor or obligation? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 1, 108–116 (in Russian).
  35. Slobodskaya A.V. (2018). Precarization of researchers and teaching staff in higher education: The academic precariat formation. Gramota, 7(93), 106–110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2018-7.22 (in Russian).
  36. Smirnova Yu.A. (2021). Precarious employment forms in higher education scope. Vestnik MGLU. Obshchestvennye nauki, 1(842), 236–245. DOI: 202110.52070/2500-347Х_2021_1_842_236 (in Russian).
  37. Smirnova Yu.A. (2022). School teachers-semiprecariat: Typology on the example of linguist teachers. Vestnik Moskovskogo gos. lingv. un-ta. Obshchestvennye nauki=Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Social Sciences, 1(846), 136–143. DOI: 10.52070/2500-347X_2022_1_846_136 (in Russian).
  38. Solov’eva T.S. (2016). New system of labor remuneration in teachers’ assessments (on the example of the Vologda Oblast). Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya, 4, 28–41 (in Russian).
  39. Standing G. (2011). The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
  40. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2020). General and specific criteria for precarious employment: Empirical analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 9, 90–102. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009905-8 (in Russian).
  41. Toshchenko Zh.T. (Ed.). (2020). Prekariat: stanovlenie novogo klassa [The Precariat: The Emergence of a New Class]. Moscow: TsSPiM.
  42. Toshchenko Zh.T., Anisimov R.I. (2019). Precarious work in Russia: status and trends. In: SPEK 2019 “Forsait “Rossiya”: budushchee tekhnologii, ekonomiki i cheloveka»: sb. plenarnykh dokladov Sankt-Peterburgskogo mezhdunar. ekon. kongressa (SPEK–2019). T. 1 [SPEC 2019 “Foresight “Russia”: The Future of Technology, Economy and People”: Collection of Plenary Reports of the Saint Petersburg International Economic Congress (SPEC–2019). Volume 1]. Saint Petersburg: INIR.
  43. Vol’chik V.V., Posukhova O.Yu. (2017). Education reforms and precarization of school teachers. ТЕRRА ECONOMICUS, 15(2), 122–138. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-2-122-138 (in Russian).
  44. Vorob’eva I.V. (2022). Social and labor status of university teachers: Elite specialists or precariat? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii=Higher Education in Russia, 31(10), 69–86. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-10-69-86 (in Russian).
  45. Zwerling H.L., Thomason T. (1995). Collective Bargaining and the Determinants of Teachers’ Salaries. Journal of Labor Research, XVI, 4, 467–484.

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today: