VolRC RAS scientific journal (printed edition)
12.04.202404.2024с 01.01.2024
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Life quality and human potential of territories"

Prerequisites and Involvement of the Rural Population in the Practice of Civic Participation

Ukhanova Y.V., Paranicheva I.V.

4 (102), 2019

Ukhanova Yu.V., Paranicheva I.V. Prerequisites and involvement of the rural population in the practice of civic participation. Problems of Territory's Development, 2019, no. 4 (102), pp. 132–147. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2019.4.102.8

DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2019.4.102.8

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Toschenko Zh.T. Chto predstavlyaet soboy sovremennoe rossiyskoe selo? // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 12. S. 89–98.
  2. Shabunova A.A. Grazhdanskaya aktivnost na sele: vozmozhnosti razvitiya // Problemy razvitiya territorii. 2016. № 3 (83). S. 7–17.
  3. Shestakov S.A. Problemy ustoychivogo razvitiya selskih territoriy Vologodskoy oblasti // Ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2011. № 5 (17). S. 154–160.
  4. Bondarenko L.V. Demograficheskaya situaciya na sele i perspektivy razvitiya selskih territoriy // Ekonomika selskohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2013. № 3. S. 53–57.
  5. Bolshakova Yu.A., Suhanova T.V. Opyt regionov Rossii po ustoychivomu razvitiyu socialnoy infrastruktury selskih territoriy // Vestn. NGIEI. 2015. Vyp. 7 (50). S. 5–11.
  6. Etzioni A. The Responsive community: a communitarian perspective. 1995 Presidential address. American Sociological Review, 1996, vol. 61, no. 1, rr. 1–11.
  7. Quaghebeur R. Participation making a difference? Critical analysis of the participatory claims of change, reversal and empowerment. Interchange, 2006, vol. 37, no. 4, rr. 309–331.
  8. Gilchrist A. The well connected community: a networking approach to community development. Bristol: Policy Press, 2004. 248 r.
  9. Vanin P. Social capital accumulation and the evolution of social participation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 2007, vol. 36, rr. 128–143.
  10. Williams G. Evaluating participatory development: tyranny, power and (re)politicization. Third World Quarterly, 2004, vol. 25, no. 3, rr. 557–578.
  11. Uhanova Yu.V. Grazhdanskoe uchastie kak element demokratii v rossiyskom obschestve // Socialnoe prostranstvo. 2018. № 2 (14). URL: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/2648. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2018.2.14.5
  12. Nikovskaya L.I., Skalaban I.A. Grazhdanskoe uchastie: osobennosti diskursa i tendencii realnogo razvitiya // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 6. S. 43–60.
  13. Almond G., Verba S. Grazhdanskaya kultura i stabilnost demokratii // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 1992. № 4. S. 122–134.
  14. Barnes S.H., Kaase M. Political action: mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979. 116 p.
  15. Pateman S. Participation and democratic theory. London: Oxford University Press, 1970. 122 p.
  16. Rensi K. Demokratiya v deystvii. Socialnoe uchastie i «tretiy sektor» v Italii // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba za rubezhom. 2003. № 1. S. 88–99.
  17. Aleksander Dzh. Vlast, politika i grazhdanskaya sfera // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 10. S. 3–17.
  18. Dalton R. The good citizen: how the young are transforming American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2007. 240 r.
  19. Anheier H.K. Civil Society: measurement, evaluation, policy. London: Earthscan, 2004. 226 p.
  20. Lester M., Salamon S., Sokolowski W. Explaining Civil Society Development. A Social Origins Approach. Baltimor: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017. 344 p.
  21. Russian Civil Society, in: Russia: Strategy, Policy and Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 386 p.
  22. Yakobson L.I. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo v moderniziruyuscheysya Rossii: analit. dokl. centra issledovaniy grazhd. obschestva i nekommerch. sektora nac. issled. un-ta «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki» po itogam realizacii proekta «indeks grazhd. obschestva – CIVICUS» // Vestn. Ros. un-ta druzhby narodov. Ser. «Politologiya». 2013. № 4. S. 5–25.
  23. Alesina A., La Ferrara E. Participation in Heterogeneous Communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, vol. 115, no. 3, rr. 847–904.
  24. Davis J. «Participatory» research for development projects: a comparison of the community meeting and household survey techniques. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1998, vol. 47, iss. 1. rr. 73–94.
  25. Skalaban I.A. Obschestvennoe uchastie kak socialnyy proekt: dis. … d-ra soc. nauk. Novosibirsk, 2017. 382 s.
  26. YakobsonL.I. Buduschee grazhdanskogo obschestva: issledovanie i proektirovanie // Grazhdanskoe obschestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2011. № 1. S. 2–7.
  27. Mersiyanova I.V. Socialnaya baza rossiyskogo grazhdanskogo obschestva // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 2009. № 4. S. 35–45.
  28. Sztompka P. Zaufanie. Podstawa społeczeństwa. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak, 2007. 424 r.
  29. Misztal B. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998. 215 p.
  30. Doverie i nedoverie v usloviyah razvitiya grazhdanskogo obschestva / otv. red. A.B. Kupreychenko, I.V. Mersiyanova. M.: Izdatelskiy dom NIU VShE, 2013. 564 s.
  31. Shabunova A.A., Guzhavina T.A., Kozhina T.P. Doverie i obschestvennoe razvitie Rossii // Problemy razvitiya territorii. 2015. № 2 (76). S. 7–19.
  32. Berdzhess E. Rost goroda: Vvedenie v issledovatelskiy proekt // Chikagskaya shkola sociologii: sb. perevodov / sost. i per. V.G. Nikolaev. M.: Ros. akad. nauk, In-t nauch. inform. po obschestv. naukam, 2015. S. 20–34.
  33. Petuhov V.V., Petuhov R.V. Demokratiya uchastiya: institucionalnyy krizis i novye perspektivy // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 5. C. 25–48.
  34. Mersiyanova I.V., Yakobson L.I. Sotrudnichestvo gosudarstva i struktur grazhdanskogo obschestva v reshenii socialnyh problem // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipalnogo upravleniya. 2011. № 2. S. 5–20.

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today: