VolRC RAS scientific journal (printed edition)
09.10.202410.2024с 01.01.2024
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Innovation potential of territorial development"

Analytical and Mathematical Description of the Structure Features of Knowledge Networks in Small Cities

Melnikova T.B.

Volume 27, Issue 4, 2023

Melnikova T.B. (2023). Analytical and mathematical description of the structure features of knowledge networks in small cities. Problems of Territory's Development, 27 (4), 150–168. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.4.126.9

DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.4.126.9

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Almeida P., Kogut B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation: Start-up firms in the semiconductor industry. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007995512597
  2. Almeida P., Kogut B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905
  3. Barabasi A.-L. (2016). Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://networksciencebook.com (accessed: April 19, 2023).
  4. Bianchi C., Galaso P., Palomeque S. (2021). Patent collaboration networks in Latin America: Extra-regional orientation and core-periphery structure? Journal of Scientometric Research, 10(1), 59–70. DOI: 10.5530/jscires.10.1s.22
  5. Easley D., Kleinberg J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511761942
  6. Gach O. (2013). Algorithmes memetiques de detection de communautes dans les reseaux complexes: Techniques palliatives de la limite de resolution. Available at: https://theses.hal.science/tel-01037937 (accessed: May 03, 2023).
  7. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. DOI: 10.2307/2118401
  8. Kravets A.G., Burmistrov A.S., Zadorozhnyi P.A. (2019). Experimental determination of the optimal parameters of the recurrent neural network for the tasks of patent classification. Modelirovanie, optimizatsiya i informatsionnye tekhnologii=Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology, 7(2), 325–338. DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2019.25.2.027
  9. Liu W., Song Y., Bi K. (2021). Exploring the patent collaboration network of China’s wind energy industry: A study based on patent data from CNIPA. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 110989. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110989
  10. Liu W., Tao Y., Yang Z., Bi K. (2019). Exploring and visualizing the patent collaboration network: A case study of smart grid field in China. Sustainability, 11(2), 465. DOI: 10.3390/su11020465
  11. Morescalchi A., Pammolli F., Penner O., Petersen A., Riccaboni M. (2015). The evolution of networks of innovators within and across borders: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 44(3), 651–668. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.015
  12. Mosalev A.I. (2022). Optimal spatial models of interregional economic cooperation in the field of innovative economy. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 18(3), 638–652. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-3-2
  13. Naumov I.V., Nikulina N.L. (2022). Assessment of the spatial heterogeneity of economic activity in the municipalities of Sverdlovsk oblast. Ekonomika regiona=Economy of Region, 18(3), 820–836. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-3-14
  14. Newman M. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001
  15. Newman M.E.J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256. DOI: 10.1137/S003614450342480
  16. Newman M.E.J. (2004). Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. In: Ben-Naim E., Frauenfelder H., Toroczkai Z. (Eds.). Complex Networks. Heidelberg: Springer, 337–370. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-44485-5_16
  17. Raikov A.N., Zhabinskaya V.P., Pereskokov I.S., Tabakov K.V. (2022). Integrated information system in the sphere of science to support interdisciplinary collaborations. Tsifrovaya ekonomika=Digital Economy, 3(19), 35–44. DOI: 10.34706/DE-2022-03-04
  18. Roach M., Cohen W.M. (2013). Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Science, 59(2), 504–525. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1644
  19. Tang C., Qiu P., Dou J. (2022). The impact of borders and distance on knowledge spillovers – evidence from cross-regional scientific and technological collaboration. Technology in Society, 70, 102014. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102014
  20. Trajtenberg M., Henderson R., Jaffe A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19–50. DOI: 10.1080/10438599700000006
  21. Wagner S., Hoisl K., Thoma G. (2014). Overcoming localization of knowledge – the role of professional service firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1671–1688. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2174
  22. Wang Y., Ghumare E., Vandenberghe R., Dupont P. (2017). Comparison of different generalization of clustering coefficient and local efficiency for weighted undirected graphs. Neural Computation, 29, 313–331. DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00914
  23. Yan B., Luo J. (2017). Measuring technological distance for patent mapping. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 423–437. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23664
  24. Yao L., Li J., Li J. (2020). Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration: A network analysis of China’s national innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120185. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120185
  25. Zaborova E.N. (2021). Entrepreneurship in small towns of the Urals. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii=Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 232(6), 254–268. DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2021-232-6-254-268